Âé¶¹ÊÓÆµ

Skip to main content
Âé¶¹ÊÓÆµ University

Center for Faculty Development

Class Participation Rubric

Found in Teaching & Advising > Grading & Assessment of Students

A+ A B C D F

·ÌýÌýActively sup-ports, engages and listens to peers (on-going)

·ÌýÌýArrives fully prepared at every session

·ÌýÌýPlays an active role in discus-sions (on-going)

·ÌýÌýComments advance the level and depth of the dialogue (consistently)

·ÌýÌýGroup dynamic and level of discussion are consistently better because of the student’s presence
Ìý

·Ìý Actively sup-ports, engages and listens to peers (ongoing)

·Ìý Arrives fully prepared at almost every session

·Ìý Plays an active role in discus-sions (ongoing)

·Ìý Comments occasionally advance the level and depth of the dialogue

·Ìý Group dynamic and level of discussion are often better because of the student’s presence

· Makes a sin-cere effort to interact with peers (on-going)

· Arrives mostly, if not fully, prepared (ongoing)

· Participates constructively in discussions (ongoing)

· Makes relevant comments based on the assigned ma-terial (on-going)

· Group dynamic and level of discussion are occasionally better (never worse) be-cause of the student’s presence

·ÌýÌýLimited inter-action with peers

·ÌýÌýPreparation, and therefore level of participation, are both incon-sistent

·ÌýÌýWhen prepared, participates constructively in discussions and makes relevant com-ments based on the assigned material

·ÌýÌýGroup dynamic and level of discussion are not affected by the student’s presence

·ÌýÌýVirtually no interaction with peers

·ÌýÌýRarely pre-pared

·ÌýÌýRarely participates

·ÌýÌýÌý Comments are generally vague or drawn from outside of the assigned material

·ÌýÌýDemonstrates a noticeable lack of interest (on occasion)

·ÌýÌýGroup dy-namic and level of dis-cussion are harmed by the student’s presence

·ÌýÌýNo interaction with peers

·ÌýÌýNever prepared

·ÌýÌýNever participates

·ÌýÌýDemonstrates a noticeable lack of interest in the material (ongoing)

·ÌýÌýGroup dynam-ic and level of discussion are significantly harmed by the student’s presence

Developed by Adam Chapnick, University of Toronto

Ìý